Killer Lies

Yes, this is another rant against the liberals who haven't the foggiest idea of what it means to protect America from evil. That's because they haven't the foggiest idea of what evil is. To them it is, in Hillary's words, "the vast right-wing conspiracy".

That people want to kill us all over the world doesn't mean a thing to them outside of their view of why it is these people want to kill us. Because of the vast right wing conspiracy of course.

Let's remember when Hillary brought up that fable she was accusing people of lying for politics in order to bring down her innocent, faithful husband. That Bill Clinton had more women while he was married to Hillary than I have owned shoes doesn't matter of course. She was only referring to the time that Bill was accused of having an affair with the cigar lady while bombing other countries to distract from his infidelity.

"I have not had sexual relations with that woman" he stressed to the world.

Liar that he was, he was more dangerous only in his lack of understanding of the E word. (besides the fact that he carried the nuclear football for 8 years)

Evil that is

Bill negotiated with one of the biggest psychotic terrorist dictators of all time. Kim Jung Il of North Korea has probably killed, incarcerated and tortured as many innocent human beings then the worst dictator and yet he was treated as if he would tell the truth when promising not to develop nuclear weapons.

We all know how that turned out. Besides NK launching a missle directly over Japan, they are now developing missiles that can reach America. Oh yeah, they already have them, and the dictator has already threatened us with the weapons that Bill helped him build.

It didn't just end with him. Who knows who else was armed by President Clinton.

Let's move on to modern day though shall we?

Iran has been playing with us for so many years it's not even funny. They are a stones throw away from nukes, some say they already have them, and politicians are still playing politics with the whole debacle.

The new Iranian president hailed "the art of martyrdom" in a televised speech.

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=45515

Here are some more of his psychotic rants:

"We want art that is on the offensive. Art on the offensive exalts and defends the noble principles, and attacks principles that are corrupt, vulgar, ungodly, and inhuman."

And...

"Art reaches perfection when it portrays the best life and best death. After all, art tells you how to live. That is the essence of art. Is there art that is more beautiful, more divine, and more eternal than the art of martyrdom? A nation with martyrdom knows no captivity. Those who wish to undermine this principle undermine the foundations of our independence and national security. They undermine the foundation of our eternity."

Lookie there, an artist Dems can appreciate. He's probably visualizing American bodies splattered all over the place with a wonderful hue of red accenting the landscape.

How about...

"Have no doubt ... Allah willing, Islam will conquer what? It will conquer all the mountain tops of the world."

This time around a Republican is in charge. President Bush is hiding from this one completely. It looks like we will know when it's time when the Iranian leader tells us it's time because George is out to lunch.

Why? Because he's relying on the UN. The same UN he decided was worthless a couple of years ago as he attacked Iraq. Don't get me wrong, he was right to attack Iraq, but he needs to do something about Iran, because they are not just going to go away.

Why do our politicians let wide-eyed psycho leaders purse the atomic bomb? It just doesn't make any sense.

Our last two presidents, Bush and Clinton, have been worthless. We need another Reagan in office. We need a man who will stand up to tyranny. (don't bring up Beirut please, yes, Reagan failed miserably there, but he didn't know what he was up against)

Our next president has to look the world in the eyes and make it blink.

And that can never be a modern Democrat.

Hillary is posturing herself for the role and that should scare every living American. She learned from her husband well how to move towards whatever the country appears to be thinking. This woman is a pure socialist though. She will impose social reforms on America that will push us towards looking more like the other great failed social experiments like German, Italy, France and the others.

Not only that, she will believe the terrorists like her husband did. Arafat was a terrorist murderer and yet Bill Clinton forced Israel to negotiate with him. Kim Jong Il is a terrorist murderer yet Bill Clinton gave him nuclear weapons.

Here's one of our traitor presidents speaking against America on foreign soil:

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=45532

He called the war in Iraq "unnecessary and unjust". He also said "I think what's going on in Guantanamo Bay and other places is a disgrace to the U.S.A.,".

And...

"I wouldn't say it's the cause of terrorism, but it has given impetus and excuses to potential terrorists to lash out at our country and justify their despicable acts."

Let's keep going...

"What has happened at Guantanamo Bay ... does not represent the will of the American people," Carter said. "I'm embarrassed about it, I think it's wrong. I think it does give terrorists an unwarranted excuse to use the despicable means to hurt innocent people."

And to wrap it up...

"I thought then, and I think now, that the invasion of Iraq was unnecessary and unjust. And I think the premises on which it was launched were false,".

So he says it's not the cause of terrorism but it is a good excuse for them to kill us.

LOL I can't do it. I can't go on. President Carter is such an idiot. He does a good enough job proving he is one all on his own.

How many Americans will die because of his stupid anti-Republican, anti-American rhetoric?

Even one is too many.

Where is John Bolton?

Between Babs calling for a recall to the attacks on Karl Rove by the media, the nomination of John Roberts to the Supreme Court and the usual idiotic attacks by Dems on Reps, missing is the status of John Bolton.

You remember him...the guy nominated to be the U.N. Ambassador by President Bush back in March?

So many people said he would be pushed through after the traitorous Republicans caved to Dem demands. "Don't have a cow they said, the Dems are playing into our hands."

If it weren't the usual Rep. traitor suspects I might have believed that, but since it involved McCain, Spector and the rest, I doubt this is a Republican plan.

President Bush is going to have to sneak him through the backdoor like a thief in the night. That is lame and shows who's really boss in the beltway, the Dems.

Attacking the Republicans

There was a cartoon in the newspaper yesterday which showed a donkey in a boat which was sitting on dry land. The cartoon bubble read "We will not accept a nominee for the Supreme Court who isn't in the mainstream".

This is exactly what the problem is with the Dems right now. They are so far out of touch, people like Pelosi, Dean, Kerry and Reid are the ones they perceive as being in touch with America.

Fortunately they couldn't be further from the truth. If the Dems were playing the moderate card like Hillary right now they might not look like such total idiots. They think America sees things their way though & they are all jumping off the cliff like lemmings, attacking America, our soldiers, our schools, our babies, Judeo/Christian values and moral and everything else America stands for.

So why am I attacking the Republicans occasionally nowadays? Because they are acting like idiots. The country gives them mandate after mandate and they wimp out. They're acting as if the country is electing them over Dems so that they can make piece with the Dems on every issue.

President Bush acts as if he needs to unite the parties and waters things down in order to try and do so. Remember the education bill with Ted Kennedy? Kennedy to this day throws his vile poisonous rhetoric at President Bush. So much for uniting.

Republicans should take charge!

Put it this way. If you were on a deserted island and you nominated someone to lead your group in order to survive, you would expect them to do things that led to your survival. If they were doing the opposite of that you would nominate someone else.

Our world as we know it is under attack, the Dems have failed to show they are capable of protecting us, we have elected Republicans to do so, and the Republicans turn back to the Dems for advice and consent.

This is outrageous and insane!

If you picked me to lead you I would lead you. I wouldn't turn to those whom you elected before, those who failed to protect you, for advice and consent.

This is why I go after President Bush and the Republicans in my blogs, because they haven't taken charge.

What's the alternative? I certainly wouldn't vote for Dems so I encourage all of you to vote for Republicans who are strong with their message. If they come of as moderate or wimpy, don't vote for them.

We might have to start doing more recalls like with Governor Davis in California. If our representatives don't do what they promise, then they should be removed quickly to minimize the damage done to our country.

Say what?

President Bush may wield a big club when it comes to our military but when it comes to social issues he has been what we referred to back in the day as a p__sy. So many things he does are nauseating.

Heck, our country is becoming one big wimpy piece of sand.

> He invited Islamic terrorist supporters into the White House to have lunch
> He wimped out on the stem cell issue allowing people to be killed for experimentation
> He won't take a stand on abortion other then saying that it should be rare
> He came to the White House with the wimpy saying "I'm a uniter, not a divider"
> Dodge ball is banned in schools - It is true, I've seen the signs in the schools
> Our military has to provide Wiccan Services for soldiers who are witches. At least it's not as bad as the Brits, they have to allow Satanic rituals in their military
> Red markers are going to be banned in school so as not to make the children feel bad when they have wrong answers marked
> Grades will be changed so kids won't feel bad when they get bad ones
> Ebonics has become an official language again in CA since they haven't the foggiest idea on the left coast how to teach English!

Well guess what President Bush, you are dividing the Republican party. Conservatives don't think your wife's jokes about you jerking off a horse were too funny, and neither were the references to "Desperate Housewives".

I know, many of you have seen the show and watch the show, but think about the garbage they are feeding your minds! Here are a few "recaps"

One Wonderful Day
One Wonderful Day - Rex dies thinking Bree poisoned him, Zana hospitalizes Felicia with a hockey stick and then holds Susan hostage at gunpoint, Carlos finally finds out that Gabby's been sexing Gardener John, Lynette's going back to work, oh and Mary Angela murdered Deirdre.

Goodbye For Now
Goodbye For Now - Lynette's plan to get Annabel a new job backfires and gets Tom fired. Carlos the Pill-Tamperer gets the wrong end of the stick and pummels gay Justin because he thinks Justin's been sexing Gabby. Rex has another heart attack, but before Bree drives him to the hospital, she must first transform into a psychotic bed-making zombie. Oh, and Mike moves in with Susan.

Sunday In The Park With George
Sunday In The Park With George - Susan discovers that Mike is good, CreePaul discovers that Felicia has him cornered, and Gardener John discovers that Gabby's baby might be his. Tom's too late and Lynette's too drunk to make use of her French maid outfit, so Tom stages a do-over wearing nothing but a pair of chafing mini-briefs. Carlos convinces Gabby that Mama's to blame for her tampered-with birth-control pills. Bree shares her thoughts, hopes, and dreams with George. And Rex...does a crossword puzzle.

Just another evening on the boob tube. Nancy Reagan may have gone to the dark side with her supporting the murder of babies for research, but at least she had class and dignity.

Wait, that sounded funny.

Well, you know what I mean.

Am I a little perturbed this evening? You betcha. Check out this little snippet from Mr. Scarborough:

SCARBOROUGH: Hey, great to have you back with us tonight.

Of course, last night, a historic night. We came out and actually started talking about the president's new selection for the Supreme Court, Justice John Roberts, a man that conservatives hailed as, you know, the type of candidate George Bush needed to select. And why? Because, in 1990, conservatives were told that this man argued to overturn Roe v. Wade.

Well, last night, we reported that on the show. And our banner actually said “Roberts: Overturn Roe v. Wade.' Well, the White House called us up during the show. They didn't like the banner. They said, we owe—we should—we should offer a correction. That is what I am going to do tonight.

So, conservatives, Republicans, members of Focus on the Family, Dr. James Dobson, Pat Robertson, pro-life advocates across America, I offer you this correction. According to the White House, Judge Roberts does not oppose Roe vs. Wade. Whew. Glad I got that off my chest.

Sooo, what did I say? I figured there was something wrong with this picture. I'm not saying that I said outright "Judge Roberts doesn't oppose Roe vs. Wade", but I figured the silence about the issue was bad. When President Bush said there shouldn't be a litmus test and that his nominees won't have to meet specific criteria I knew we were going to have problems.

Show me one statement by Judge Roberts that shows he opposes abortion.

This is all we have and this comes from a lefty site:

"While serving as principal deputy solicitor general from 1989-1993, he authored briefs calling for Roe v. Wade to be overruled,"

This theirier argument against him? That he authored/co-authored briefs?

Abortion is murder and President Bush should come out and say so. He should challenge our nation to do the right thing and end it.

I know, in Texas you worked against abortion. So what happened?

How can you go from saying you want more Justices like Scalia and Thomas and then you nominate someone like a Souter or O'Connor?

So the White House called Joe Scarborough and told him to retract the statement that Roberts is not against Roe vs. Wade.

What a bizarre thing to do!

Bankrolling our enemies - Foreign and domestic

I heard a GI say the other day that it used to be that our enemy in Iraq would worry about being captured and tortured. They didn't like the idea of going to Abu Ghraib. Now it's a different story. Now they don't mind being captured by America and going to America's prison hotel complex anywhere in the world.

Why? Because Dems and liberals have made it known that they won't stand for any torture of a prisoner of war. Nah, that's putting it too rough. They won't stand for any abuse...still too rough. They won't stand for any...okay, why bother. Dems & libs won't stand for anything less then Rice Pelaf, free Qurans, prayer and meditation time, prayer towels and back massages.

Only the last one was made up.

These are people who hate our guts, want to kill us and do so once they are released back into the world.

Liberal organizations, which get tax immunity because they pretend to be "non-partisan", are making sure our enemies laugh at us, disrespect us and kill us without fear of reprisals.

The prisoners in Abu Ghraib spit at our soldiers, throw crap (that's feces for you intellectuals) as well as a hundred other things at our guys.

Two history lessons. We won the wars against Japan and Germany only by kicking the crap out of them and making them accept unconditional surrenders.

Dems and libs think you win wars by apologizing for whatever it is we might have done and offering payment.

As far as I am concerned these people have caused our country to be brought to the brink of global all out war. The only reason I say "at the brink" is because we haven't realized the war has been going on for a very long time. It just took a while to get to our doorsteps.

I was talking to someone about this the other day & she said "oh, we shouldn't profile because we are just as bad as anyone else". I said "really...how can you say that?" to which she replied, of course, "Timothy McVeigh". The standard "we are just as bad" example you will get from any lib and Dem.

Press them for another example and of course you hear crickets.

While the western world has been trying to learn from its mistakes, grow up and help other countries around the world, the opposite has been happening in countries who don.

> China is threatening global thermonuclear war if we try to help Taiwan gain independence.
> Russia is helping Iran achieve their nuclear ambitions, which of course means nuclear weapons
> Clinton made sure North Korea has nuclear weapons with his misguided childish trust for one of the biggest, most ruthless dictators in the history of the world.
> Afghanistan and Iraq will not turn out well if the Dems and libs keep whining that we are worse than the terrorists

The policy of appeasement hasn't worked in the Middle East. Israel has been attacked daily while pulling back from the so- called "occupied territories". You know, the ones that Israel captured from their tyrannical neighbors after having been attacked in three major wars. When it was realized that they could never win at war with Israel, the Arab countries who have been trying to eradicate Israel since their day of nation status, 1948, they started to fund terrorists like Yassir Arafat.

The PLO and the terrorist so-called "Palestinians" became the darlings of the left. To them, Arafat was a freedom-fighter not a terrorist. The western world looked the other way as Arafat killed thousands of Jews in almost daily bombings of buses.

Arafat and the other terrorists, all financed by America to the tune of millions, if not hundreds of millions of dollars. President Bush just promised another 15 million to the terrorists. The millions of dollars which were given in the past have not been accounted for and yet they want to give these people more. The "Palestinian" people live in squalor as the heads of their government eat caviar, drive in limousines and fly in Leer jets.

Americans fight to burn the flag as a right of speech. I could care less if they burn it. They are traitors anyway and what else would I expect from them? They decry our treatment of the rest of the world and blame all the worlds' ills on us. How about if they looked at the countries that are in question?

> Africa - Dictators & warlords. They have pocketed aid money for 30 years. Millions still starving and dying under Islamic rule
> Arab countries
>> Let's start with Afghanistan. They drove women into soccer fields, had them sit on the ground in the middle of the field, and with an audience, shot them in the head. What was their crime? The disgraced the family somehow. They cut off hands, they stoned to death women & applied all the wonderful Koranic laws faithfully.
>> Iraq - Dems & libs love to say we were responsible for Saddam because we supported him during the Iran/Iraq war. Whatever. He was a tyrant and he is now gone. They want that wonderful murdering butcher back so he can cut out some more tongues, rape more women and all the other fun things he did.
>> Turkey - Good luck if you don't agree with the government. Plenty of human rights violations there but Europe is trying to pretend that they really don't matter.
>> Iran - Rushing to nuclear weapons, John Kerry proposed to them that we would provide equipment that was needed to finish their "peaceful" nuclear program. Fortunately they turned him down. Something about "verification" I guess. Typical, even after the lesson of Korea the Dems still want to "trust" psycho leaders who speak of destroying the world.
>> Saudi Arabia - A kingdom. In the 21st century, a kingdom. Unbelievable. Plenty of bad stuff happening there obviously. Example, the Saudis let 15 girls burn to death rather than let them out of the school because they weren't covered properly.

http://www.worthynews.com/news-features-3/Saudi-Arabia-religious-police.html

'nuff said there

I could go on & on about these kingdoms & dictatorships but why bother?

Let's get to the one of the biggest problems we have.

China

China owns half our country. They sell to us more than we sell to them by far. I challenge you to flip over two products that and see anything other than "made in China" on them.

China currently spends 90 billion dollars on defense. In our dollars that's probably equivalent to a trillion dollars.

Where are they getting all these bucks anyway? The western nations of course.

The western nations are financing their own demise. It's like giving a crook a paycheck so he can buy your guns which he will then hold up to your head.

Add to these issues the fact that China and India go beyond abortion. They kill their children after they are born. Infanticide is much cheaper than abortion I guess. They can also determine the sex and get rid of the women that way without having to pay for expensive ultra sounds. The problem with what you might call "selective reduction" is that no girls, no reproduction, no future generations. That's why China is now paying families to have girls instead of killing them.

Abortion is financed by Dems and libs all over the world. Germany and other countries are experiencing negative population growth. Their economies are collapsing as there are no future generations coming up to help finance the health care and living costs of the older generation.

The writing is on the wall and it seems many people can't read.

I guess they're too busy learning Ebonics.

Every 5th or every 10th

Hey, I'm going to smack every 5th person. Just kidding. But if I really meant that, wouldn't you watch me to see how many I've smacked so that if you were in a line to go past me you wouldn't be one of those with a red face?

Let's see, 1, 2, 3, 4 .. smack!

Easy enough right?

I know this sounds silly, but this is even sillier. A man representing New York security today made a statement on how they were going to search bags to make sure no bad guys bring bombs on board a train or bus.

He said "We are going to come up with a criteria for searching bags, either every 5th or every 10th bag...something like that"

No joke, he really said that.

This reminds me of when our local area runs sobriety checkpoints. They tell the media when and where they are going to do it. The media in turn advertise it on the radio with statements like "watch out tonight on route 50 between Turnip street and Wilson Blvd, they will be running sobriety checkpoints there".

Would you go near that area if you were drunk? I don't think so.

When you come up on a sobriety checkpoint, how many times have you seen someone turn around when they see what it is? We know why they are turning around and it's not because they suddenly remembered they left their toothbrush at home. They turned around because they are drunk and they don't want to get caught!

When it happens you probably think "why don't the cops chase down that person who just turned around?".

Because it is against the law for them to do so. Huh? Why would it be against the law to chase someone down for turning around at a checkpoint? Because it is profiling. Police are not allowed to assume a person is drunk if someone is turning around at a sobriety checkpoint.

How about terrorists?

Americans are going to die because of the stupid methods that we are using to find terrorists!

Americans have already died because of our "sensitivity"!

We don't want to deal with the illegals in the country so some illegals hijack planes and crash them into buildings. What they heck, they only killed 3,000 people or so. No big deal right?

We don't want to use racial profiling, so instead of focusing at who the likely people are to kill American and Israeli citizens, we will look at everyone. I don't think people understand what profiling is so let me explain it.

From http://www.dictionary.com:
Profiling
n : recording a person's behavior and analyzing psychological characteristics in order to predict or assess their ability in a certain sphere or to identify a particular group of people

It doesn't mean to say that every person of a specific group of people will behave a certain way or do one specific thing, it means that we can "identify a particular group of people" with examination of "a person's behavior and analyzing psychological characteristics".

Example:

> If a person were found murdered by suffocation through curry powder in their throat, one might assume the murderer came from India or Pakistan because people from these countries where curry powder is used the most.

Just a little comedy there.

Okay, so estimates range from 6% to 10% of Muslims in the world are "militant". There are approximately 1.2 billion Muslims. That means there are approximately 72,000,000 militant Muslims around the world. Seventy-two "million"!

You would think that if there were so many militant Muslims out there there would be violent actions against anyone who isn't Muslim every day wouldn't you?

There are plenty every day of every year. You just don't hear about them. Here are a few from an article written by Daniel Pipes at:

http://www.city-journal.org/html/11_4_fighting_militant.html

Islamist violence is a global phenomenon. During the first week of April, for example, I counted up the following incidents, relying only on news agency stories, which are hardly exhaustive: deaths due to violent Islamist action occurred in Algeria (42 victims), Kashmir (17), the southern Philippines (3), Bangladesh (2), and the West Bank (1); assorted violence broke out in many other countries, including Afghanistan, Indonesia, Nigeria, and Sudan; courts handed down judgments against radical Muslims in France, Germany, Italy, Jordan, Turkey, the United States, and Yemen. Islamists are well organized: fully 11 of the 29 groups that the State Department calls "foreign terrorist organizations" are Islamist, as are 14 out of 21 groups outlawed by Britain's Home Office.

You can't find a needle in the haystack unless you admit that the needle looks and feels different than the straw.

Wouldn't you look for something that is shiny and metallic looking instead of picking up every single piece of straw.

We can't pick out the one terrorist from the million other people by randomly choosing bags. We even decrease the odds of finding the bag of explosives because obviously they will simply count to avoid...

1, 2, 3 ...

John Roberts

Yeah, I know, many are saying I grinned too soon. I'm starting to agree with you.

Unfortunately the only thing I had to base my happiness on was one Dem I heard complaining about John Roberts before I tuned out the news for the evening.

It's not looking good. It looks like Bush picked a "moderate" conservative which means he will vote liberal on social issues. Moderate conservatives typically are for the money but not the morals and values.

There's no way to tell right now so we'll have to wait & see. Unfortunately, this doesn't send any kind of clear message about the moral direction of America under President Bush.

As is usual with this administration, the weather is cloudy with no chance of clearing up.

Please God, give us a real conservative next time. President Bush is standing there grinning with his hand out in friendship to our enemies, foreign and domestic, while they stand over us with knives, guns and bombs. The only people that he is uniting are the Democrats. Republicans are getting tired of his wimpy ways.

Election after election for 11 years now, Americans have been sending what are clear signals to me about what kind of people they want in power. Republicans with clear morals and values and who support Life, not abortion.

Unfortunately President Bush hasn't gotten the message. I guess he's too busy learning grammar.

So it goes

Hey Karl, you got him elected twice, give him the message that America is tired of liberals ruining our great country wouldja?

John Roberts for Supreme Court

All I have to say on this issue is, the libs are ticked, so I'm happy.

Have a nice day.

:)

Do you CAIR?

The words of the current head of CAIR which is the Council on American Islamic Relations.

Ibrahim Hooper of CAIR, "I want to see the U.S become an Islamic nation."

Do you?

> In case you're wondering, Islamic law calls for stoning a woman to death for infidelity.
> Women are killed just for the accusation of acting or dressing improperly.
> Women are forced to wear clothes that cover their entire body.
> Hands are cut of if you steal.
> Tongues are cut out if you speak against them.

This is just a taste of what we will be subjected to if America becomes a "Islamic Nation".

Think I'm exaggerating or lying? Search yourself, but make sure you search "Islamic Nation"(s) not countries where Muslims live. Try Libya, Turkey, Iran, former Iraq (maybe even present day Iraq soon) and other countries that are ruled by Islamic leaders.

Here are a couple of articles on this:

http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Printable.asp?ID=9981

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=45328

Here's a bit about Turkey, a country considered to be "modern" enough to allow into the European Union.

http://www.derechos.org/human-rights/mena/turkey.html

If this and all the other countries who suppress freedom is what Muslims want to pass on as their legacy to the rest of the world I don't any part of it.

Muslims need to speak out against the fundamentalists everywhere, not just against the terrorists. Heck, they don't even speak out loudly against them, so why would we ever expect them to speak out against the Islamic nations who terrorize people by the millions every day!

Again I ask, do you want America to be an Islamic nation?

The Loving and Peaceful Left

Here's a response from the "intellectual left" to one of my articles.

I am a "liberal." I send food DIRECTLY to Africa. It's easy. Find the address of churches. If that's singing then I'm an opera star buddy. I HATE you CONS, greedy slobs.

Greedy slobs? I donate to charities as I'm sure many Republicans do. Unlike Dems though, I think Reps believe money that is donated, public or private, should be accounted for. Also, if good money is thrown after bad, as has been the case for so many years in Africa, it is time to reevaluate how support is provided.

By "bad" I mean that there are too many warlords and corrupt officials who are pocketing aid money. On top of that, the climate conditions make it impossible to create self-sustaining farm environments over there.

I don't say we should stop trying to help people around the world, but when Reps do, they won't get credit for it anyway. President Bush rescued 50 million people from tyranny in Afghanistan and Iraq and yet Dems accuse him of killing civilians intentionally for political gain.

President Clinton sent millions of condoms to Africa. This was his solution to stopping AIDS over there. He might have asked them if they like to wear them first though. They don't, and AIDS spread as much after the condom donation as before. Your tax dollars at work.

President Bush set up a simple abstinence program and wherever it is used, new AIDS cases are dropping.

Billions have been wasted over the last 30 years in Africa and 90% of it unaccounted for. Billions were wasted in Iraq with the oil for food scandal, much of it unaccounted for.

I'm not saying we shouldn't help those in need, what I'm saying is we should have a plan. Why open our wallets in the name of decency without having a plan or holding people accountable?

Kofi Annan is still in office. Why? His son is proven to have connections with organizations who pocketed oil for food money, and Kofi turned his head away when Saddam Hussen made a public statement that he was going to give $25,000 to family members of people who killed themselves while killing Israeli citizens.

Think about that, oil for food money going to kill Israeli citizens. Why Jews support Dems is beyond me. But that's a different issue.

Much if not most of the donated money that is disbursed through our government to charity causes in other countries is good money thrown after bad.

That's okay loving reader, I may or may not like you and/or your opinions, but I still love and pray for you.

:)

Another day, another Dem accusation

How do you tell when a Democrat has done something wrong?

He/She doesn't challenge the accusation and neither does the media.

How do you tell when a Republican does something wrong?

He/She apologizes incessantly ad nauseam even if nothing wrong was really done. The accusation is enough for a Republican to wimper and quit in shame.

How do you tell when a Democrat is lying about a Republican?

When He/She asks the Republican to resign.

I think every Democrat has demanded the resignation of every Republican in office...ever.

Sometimes a stupid Republican gives in and quits. Examples include of course Trent Lott and Richard Nixon.

Trent Lott didn't do anything wrong, compared to KKK Bird who says the word Nigger every chance he gets. Why bother comparing...tell me what he did wrong? Nothing. The Dems lined up for weeks calling for his resignation which he finally gave.

Richard Nixon with his stupid attempted cover-up of Watergate, which he had nothing to do with, was tame compared to rapist and Grand Jury liar President Bill Clinton. If the Democrat break-in was so horrible, why was there no mention of the many break-ins, shootings and other violent acts committed by Dems at Republican offices before the 2004 election?

The interesting thing is Dems always holler for resignations without as much as an investigation. Did you ever notice how a Dem always screams guilty before proven guilty?

Unless it's a pedophile, rapist or a murderer that is.

Now it's Karl Rove they're after and we all know why. Karl Rove was the mastermind behind President Bush's last two successful elections and that has the Dems ticked off. Without any proven evidence, they say he was behind the CIA leak of Wilson's wife.

You know, Joe Wilson, the Democrat hack who pretends to be non-partisan. Joe Wilson and his wife are after their 15 minutes of fame, and as is the case with many Dems, will do anything and say anything to bring down a Republican.

Dems have been tossing baseless unproven accusations and lies for too many years. I think the American public might finally treat them like chicken little and will ignore and laugh at them.

No Litmus Test

Thank you Mr. President for letting us know how you stand on abortion.

You see, there are many of us who believe abortion is murder and that 4,000 human beings are murdered every day in this country... Legally.

It's nice of you to tell us there isn't any criteria for whom you will pick other then he/she has to be a nice guy.

myway.com article

"I don't like it when a friend gets criticized," Bush said. "I'm loyal to my friends.

"I'll pick people who, one, can do the job, and people who are honest, people who are bright and people who will strictly interpret the Constitution and not use the bench to legislate from,"

Always the dreamer.

Here's what Mr. Biden thinks of your "not use the bench to legislate from" as he tells us why a filibuster might be necessary:

"I'll tell you why," said Biden. "Because a circuit court judge is bound by stare decisis. They don't get to make new law."

wnd.com article

I didn't know Justices were supposed to make new law did you?

But they already have.

They made the law in 1973 which allowed women to kill their children and men to turn their heads and pretend that's a good thing.

President Bush you are a dolt. You have the IQ of a frog and shoot from the hip way too much, and take way to long to do it anyway. A calculated decision to you is 5. Fortunately you are smarter than Dems when taking on the enemy. I doubt you are good in the long run though so I will be glad when your presidency is over.

You speak against terrorism, yet force Sharon to negotiate with terrorists.

You spoke against stem cell research and then proclaimed proudly how you are the first American president to provide federal funds for it. Yes, that's right, tax dollars are financing the murder of humans for experimentation for the first time in history thanks to you, our genius president.

I've been scared of your presidency since day one. I've only been a little less scared than your opponents which is why I voted for you twice.

President Bush, if you pick a pro-death appointee to be on the Supreme Court you will personally be responsible for the deaths of 4,000 people a day. Up until now you could hide from that "honor" as the Dems might consider it, but you don't have that luxury anymore.

LIFE has to be the first litmus test every elected official passes.

The question should be "do you support abortion or stem cell research?"

The answer should be "yes" or "no" only.

There is no room for the Hitlers of today to explain how it is better for the baby to be dead, or better for the mother for her to kill her child.

Do I have to quote the Declaration of Independence again?

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness"

Obviously without the first one, the other two are meaningless.

Sore Loser

Isn't it great when people try to rewrite history? No, it isn't, but they do it anyway.

Click here for the news.telegraph.co.uk article

David McCullough's book 1776 came out on our Independence day so he could try to rub in our noses that George Washington was really a snob and a poor tactician.

Sorry Mr. McCullough, I don't know if you read the papers, but America the war!

Yes, our "poor tactician" just kicked the Brit tails all over the place.

We had a ragtag army, they had a well dressed, well supplied army.

While they were so brilliantly exposing themselves to us head on with ancient war tactics, we were hiding behind trees picking them off like flies.

Who did you say was the poor tactician?

Old age must be setting in.

Oh well, I still salute the brave soldiers who came over here to fight for what they thought was right.

... and I have nothing against the Brits personally nowadays, except when they lie & cheat their way into our American corporations, affecting our way of life, which has happened to me.

The story running like this in a Brit newspaper reminds me of Scott Ritter writing for Al Jazeera.

The Brits even made this opening statement:

"A pro-British account of America's War of Independence topped the United States' bestseller lists yesterday, the day it celebrated its freedom from rule by London."

I know whoever wrote that column was just gushing for joy.

Oh well, it was America who was celebrating our Independence and our victory, not the British Mr. McCullough. :)

What is it good for?

On the local radio they played the song "War" as in "hugghh, what is it good for?"

Figures. Of course they would pick this song on the 4th of July, a day we celebrate our Independence through what....? War of course.

The Brits weren't willing to just turn over the colonies for nothing. They were willing to kill and be killed to protect them, and we were willing to kill and be killed in order to pull away from England.

Is war ever warranted? Ask the Jews who survived Hitler. Ask the millions of Africans who starve, die and are hacked to pieces by the warlords and dictators to this day.

What is the liberal response to this horror which has been committed in Africa for so many years?

They sing of course.

They're latest gig is a thing called "Live8". I guess it's a play on "Live Aid" but without money. Why no money this time? Because they found out that billions and billions of dollars are unaccounted for over there. As a matter of fact, of all the money that was sent to Africa, yes, billions and billions, none of it can be accounted for!

So why doesn't the money go to charity or an aid organization which will send food to Africa? Because they're just singing for "awareness". As if we aren't or haven't been aware of the horrors committed in Africa all these years.

Remember Somalia anyone? President Clinton turned tail & ran when he realized his touchy feely mission involved actual combat that would get our soldiers killed. Who knows how many Somalians died when we pulled out like that. Of course they want us to do the same with Iraq.

I digress...

So they want to sing for awareness? What do they think is going to happen to cause change in war-torn Africa? Do they really think a lullaby or an anti-war song is going to stop the mayhem? Whatta laugh.

What is it good for? War is the only thing that will end the horror in Africa. Some day they will have to face this. Hiding from evil doesn't mean evil doesn't exist, it just means you don't see it. Evil still sees you though and it will kill you or hack you to pieces in a heartbeat.

That's why libs are fine singing songs, they just shouldn't have any kind of power or influence over life and death.

They would just sing and say something stupid like "can't we all just get along?" Or maybe "Puff the magic Dragon" as John Kerry looks on at Peter Yarrow and pretends to puff on a joint. Yes, he really did this while he was running for president.

Again I salute all the vets on this day who have sacrificed in one way or another for us Americans to live the American dream. Yes, I salute you lib soldiers too. :)

Happy Independence Day!

This is truly an historic day.

Rather then harp on America's ills, I will instead say that this is still the greatest country on God's green earth.

We may have problems, but we can overcome them through our united efforts. I see us coming together more and more every day.

I salute our veterans past & present who have fought valiantly for our country. Democrat or Republican, we have all shed blood for our country.

I salute all those who fight for decency to try and preserve what's good about our great nation.

I salute everyone who is Marching Together for Life knowing our only reward comes in the afterlife.

http://www.marchtogether.com

Salute and God Bless America!

Laura Ingraham attacked

When Laura Ingraham found out she had cancer it excited the liberals. The thought of her biting the big one and silencing her must have had them shaking in anticipation.

Comments at the Democrat Underground show you their feelings of admiration and respect for her.

Click here for the wonderful Democrat Undergound

That was where there were 18 deleted messages of dems wishing her ill the other day.

Deleted messages. Those are ones that the webmaster of the Underground had to remove because they violated their terms of use so you can imagine what they contained.

Michelle Malkin points out a few of the "well wishers" statements on her site which I'm sure were taken from democratunderground before they were removed.

http://michellemalkin.com/archives/002242.htm

"She probably gave it to herself..."

"I don't pray for Nazis or other Totalitarian Scum"

"I hope she goes into remission and fucking chokes to death."

Wow, that's deep stuff coming from the intellectual left.

At least the original post had this statement:

"Let's keep her in our prayers"

I will pray for y'all even if you don't pray for us. We are all God's children.