The Morning After

Sounds like a nuclear holocaust movie doesn't it? Nah, it's about something closely related, the pro-abortionist attack on mankind using "better living through chemistry".

This was my response to an article written by Michelle Malkin about Planned Abortionhood.

Ms Malkin,

In reference to http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=35930.

I went to an acupuncturist with a friend of mine in little Tibet (Telluride,
CO). While I was waiting for my friend, I read a feminist magazine from the
70s and was shocked to learn that the morning after pill was first tried
back then with horrible consequences. After this attempt and failure to
bring a magic quick fix abortion pill to market it was abandoned.

Thirty years later it is brought out once again, with these pro-abortionists
pretending that the 70s live trials didn't happen.

They knew back then how horrible the pill was. They also know how horrible
it is today, but this nation and many others around the world have been so
desensitized to so many things that a few hundred horrible side effects and
deaths here & there don't even warrant a mention in any of the major
newspapers.

Also, the thing to note is that there are two morning after pills.

One is to be used immediately after sexual intercourse or the success rate
drops to almost half after just 3 days.
The other is the RU486 type which is used to discard an unwanted human
being, AKA known to the abortionists as a embryo or fetus, depending on how
many weeks it is along.

The first one pretends to stop the pregnancy from occurring
The second method clearly is an attempt at clinical abortion

RU486 is only supposed to be used up to 49 days. Holly Patterson was at the limit of that time.

http://pages.map.com/lroberge/ru486.htm

Here's an article on the morning after pill from a pro-abortionist:

http://www.austinreview.com/articles/2000_05/henarypill.htm

Note letter C)

C) irritates the lining of the uterus so that if the egg is fertilized, the
embryo will not attach to the lining of the uterus.

In other words, if life has begun, it will be aborted, that is, if for some
reason it doesn't attach itself to another part of the woman and cause some
incredibly serious problem from that point on.

Another thing. Isn't it interesting how wanna-be Buddhists won't kill a
flea, yet they are pro-abortion?

Peter